Jan-Anders to Dan: We all know that Marshas next contribution is not predictable and therefore dynamic but does she also got a sense of humour?
Andre: Disagree Jan-Anders. Her next contribution is very predictable. The only thing that cannot be predicted is what static pattern she is going to use: ignoring the post, evading the issue,wriggling her way out by claiming to be misrepresented, misunderstood or otherwise wrongfully addressed. Anyone of these predictable scenarios involve a static choice. Now, to follow Dan: if Marsha comes up with a novel response, a response she has not displayed before, a response which shatters her own predictable patterns... then she is acting Dynamically. Since I have been on this discuss I have not seen this. (not that this means much!but go through the archives as well). You regard this as a display of dynamic behaviour? And, ps, no, I do not think Marsha has a sense of humour. She takes herself too seriously...too ever changing, conventionally herself. She only laughs in spite. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
