16 jun 2011 kl. 11.43 skrev [email protected]: >> J-A: >> If all patterns where static there should be no need to specify them as >> static. Dynamic patterns are these patterns that are NOT static. Not this, >> not that.. Evolution is ?a dynamic pattern for ex. > > Dan: > > "In this plain of understanding static patterns of value are divided > into four systems: inorganic patterns, biological patterns, social > patterns and intellectual patterns. They are exhaustive. That's all > there are. If you construct an encyclopedia of four topics-Inorganic, > Biological, Social and Intellectual-nothing is left out. No "thing," > that is. Only Dynamic Quality, which cannot be described in any > encyclopedia, is absent." (LILA, chapter 12) > > Dan comments: > > It seems pretty clear (to me) that Dynamic Quality is not a pattern. > It cannot be described by what it is, only by what it is not. > >> >> Have a noisy dye > > Aye, > > Dan
J-A: Well, from what I wrote earlier today, it seems that the more logic and sound something is the more reasonable and static, leaving nothing but stupidity and chaos for Quality.. I like Marsha's lines because she reminds me of someone, but I can't say that I understand her point.. I think I must take a break J-A Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
