Hello Marsha Thanks for your humble answer.
28 jun 2011 kl. 15.41 Marsho wrote: > On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote: > >> Hi Marsha >> >> 27 jun 2011 kl. 18.44 sMarsha wrote: >> >>> Not to be repeating myself, I neither accept the notion of freewill, nor >>> reject it. Same goes with determinism and causation. I accept that these >>> are conventional (static) notions, but not Ultimately real. While living >>> within a conventional culture it seems wise to sustain social and >>> biological patterns whenever necessary for one will be held responsible to >>> that level's "moral" code (laws and punishment. ) >> >> Even if you neither accept nor reject it. I really would like to understand >> what you mean with "The notion of Free Will". Please. >> >> Jan-Anders > > > Marsha, > > It means whatever it conventional means. What is the meaning of the pattern > named Justice? How would you describe its meaning? How would you describe > the meaning of any pattern. I understand static patterns to represent a > collection of interdependent, ever-changing particular momentary events > (process) which constantly change as they arise, abide and pass away: and as > they are continually altered by an individual?s static history and the > dynamics of the event. I have mentioned before that I tend also to think of > patterns, pattern(x) for instance, to include all-that-is > opposite-from-non-pattern(x). That may include a dictionary definition. - > The horns of a rabbit might be a static notion or pattern. > > How well do you think you understand my explanation? > > > Marsha Not really sure. You intend to sell a Norwegian Blue Parrot? Try again, please. Jan-Anders Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
