Hi all. There are things we ought to see as humans. I'd put it this way:
--- To some extent we are free to choose to use our free will or follow static patterns. A hole in the wall, a break in the fence, is all we need to know that there is a way out and thus we know that we are free to stay inside or not. The prisoner can then be held responsible for not escaping and using his freedom. --- Watch in! Jan-Anders 6 aug 2011 kl. 02.04 Craig wrote: > [Steve] >> [dmb] wonders how we can have moral responsibility without free will, and >> I wonder how you can have free will without conscious deliberation >> about choices. > > You're both right. > > [Steve] >> If we follow the "extent to which" notion of freedom as >> following free will > > 1) We don't "follow free will" & > 2) Pirsig says we act freely "to the extent we follow DQ". > But he doesn't say that we act freely ONLY to the extent we follow DQ. > He leaves it open that there are other ways to be free; e.g., by > making free choices. > Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
