Hello Dave, Let's not forget that bullets as patterns are ever-changing, inter-dependent and impermanent processes. imho
Marsha On Aug 9, 2011, at 6:56 AM, David Thomas wrote: > On 8/8/11 5:01 PM, "David Buchanan" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> dmb says: >> Yes, there is a big difference. I think that was Sam's point. We build >> tornado >> shelters because tornados do damage, not because we hold them morally >> responsible for their actions. Same with brain-diseased psychopaths. We lock >> them up because they do damage, not because we hold them morally responsible. >> We can identify them as the cause of the damage, so they were responsible as >> an efficient cause, like a bullet, but they cannot be held responsible as >> moral agents, Sam says. > > Dave asks: > Ah, but what would Bob say? Or better yet what would that ever mouthy MoQ > say about that bullet? As Tuukka suggests bullets are part of the moral > order too. They have preferences. They evolve. They seek Dynamic Quality. > > So what do bullets prefer? Why freedom, of course. Freedom from the > restraints of cartridge, powder, and gun. Freedom to fly, to defy, if only > for an instant, the shackles of gravity. Free for the chance to be part of a > series of dynamic events that change the world for better. Or worse. > Or if not, just to briefly fly before dropping back to earth whence they > came. Ah it's a good life. > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
