On Aug 9, 2011, at 1:56 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > Marsha said to dmb, > > Your claim to 'free will' is by right of static, convention only. I am > interested in the MoQ, NOT Contemporary Pragmatism, as such I am not > interested in what dmb says that Charlene says that James says. > > > > dmb says: > Nope. You're quite mistaken on both accounts. Free will refers to concrete > experience or DQ and I'm using James to explain the MOQ. Clearly, you missed > the point.
Marsha: IMHO, it is the MoQ that can be used to improve Jamesian philosophy. - Needless to say, I will continue to read your posts. I appreciate your enthusiasm for the James. Maybe some day I will become more interested. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
