[DMB]
I mean we cannot rightly say that "all actions are moral and some
actions are downright immoral".
[Arlo]
Patterns only become "immoral" in contrast/context to/with other
patterns. A "virus" does not act immorally, the immorality derives from
the perspective of the higher pattern with which it is in conflict.
So, I'd disagree, all patterns are ipso facto moral patterns but in a
contextual milieu of conflicting/constrasting/competing patterns,
judgements about "immorality" are formed.
"Immorality", then, is a judgement derived from conflicting moral
patterns (and moral levels, within a MOQ), a statement about which moral
pattern should triumph in that conflict.
Victorian social morals, for example, are social moral patterns. But
when they seek to dominate (are in conflict with) intellectual moral
patterns, we can (using a MOQ) say that it would be immoral for those
social patterns to dominate (triumph) over the intellectual patterns
they are in conflict with.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
