Hi Matt and all, Since you are talking relationship, there has to be a standard for judgment. Am I a decent human being? What are my credentials?
For myself as a self employed plumber I was always pretty messy. As a singer in a Church choir I observed that something occurred that was confusing. I could not adapt my spontaneity and messiness as a plumber to singing. I had to change spontaneity to harmony, and messiness to a written structured libretto. I had to get into a different place. I made efforts, got into different places in discipline for an acceptance as a singer. It required study! My take on that is: Don't look to "a one discipline fits all" solution, like logic, in a metaphysical discussion DQ/SQ where a precision needed for understanding is important to communication. It's a struggle. Joe On 9/6/11 1:20 PM, "Matt Kundert" <[email protected]> wrote: > And perhaps the most > important question for amateur self-definition: even if you would > never make anyone else follow your own standard, what is > _your relationship to others_? In a discipline, this has a clear answer. > But in amateur philosophy, it might be something to continually > meditate on. > > Matt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
