On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:25 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > > Steve said to dmb: > ...You need to point out where exactly the reasoning of the particular > argument in question depends on the assumption of the S/O picture if in fact > it does and show how he logic falls apart without that assumption. ...Now > where exactly did I invoke an SOM premise in that discussion? > > > dmb says: > > Well, since you're asking me to do what I just did, I'd be a fool to think > that doing it again would make any difference. > > Either you understand the criticism or you don't. Whatever. It doesn't really > matter to me. But you should understand, at least, that it is not possible to > answer or defeat any criticism unless and until you understand it. > > > Checkmate.
Marsha: Checkmate? More like you're 'folding.' Using names like "asshole" just validates that point. You are an intellectual fraud. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
