Hi Marsha, I agree. "I could tell you but you wouldn't get it anyway" is obviously no checkmate. And what an odd move it is to unilaterally declare victory in a conversation.
Best, Steve On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:49 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:25 PM, david buchanan wrote: > >> >> >> Steve said to dmb: >> ...You need to point out where exactly the reasoning of the particular >> argument in question depends on the assumption of the S/O picture if in fact >> it does and show how he logic falls apart without that assumption. ...Now >> where exactly did I invoke an SOM premise in that discussion? >> >> >> dmb says: >> >> Well, since you're asking me to do what I just did, I'd be a fool to think >> that doing it again would make any difference. >> >> Either you understand the criticism or you don't. Whatever. It doesn't >> really matter to me. But you should understand, at least, that it is not >> possible to answer or defeat any criticism unless and until you understand >> it. >> >> >> Checkmate. > > > > Marsha: > Checkmate? More like you're 'folding.' Using names like "asshole" just > validates that point. You are an intellectual fraud. > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
