Marsha: If you ever ask a real question, I'll be quite surprised and amazed. But you've given me no reason to suspect that. You've given me every reason to think quite the opposite. I think you have no business even being here. If you are genuinely interested in anything I have to say about James and the MOQ, you can just read what's already in the archives. I mean, you can keep asking if you like but I have absolutely no interest in talking to you. I think you fully deserve to be ignored. I'm convinced that the average level of hostility and stupidity would drop dramatically if you went away from this place. Sigh. One can hope.
> From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:42:59 -0400 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MD] W.J. Eastern influences > > > On Oct 4, 2011, at 9:17 AM, david buchanan wrote: > > > > > > > Marsha said: > > Bob Doyle stated that W.J. was the first! And he bemoaned that other > > philosophers borrowed from W.J. without giving him proper credit. But > > that's just foolishness. It has been documented that W.J. read and reread, > > in the often cited crisis period of his life, Buddhist and Vedic texts. ... > > > > Marsha later added: > > The post was about William James and the comment made by Bob Doyle, and a > > legitimate question. > > > > > > dmb says: > > Bob Doyle's statement has nothing to do with Buddhism or Vedic texts. He > > said James was the first to come up with a two-stage model of free will. > > Your question is not only illegitimate, it's predicated on a fictional > > claim that no sane person would make. > > > > Marsha: > Yes, I know. Doyle was chastising many philosophers for borrowing from W.J. > without giving him credit. I was pointing out that W.J. was influenced by > Buddhist and Vedic thinking and failed to give these ancient traditions their > proper due. The legitimate question: How does William James improve the > MoQ? As far as I can see he does not. It just points backwards and has > nothing to say about Quality, static patterns, or the hierarchical, > evolutionary structure that helps evaluate many conflicting patterns. > > I would like to have you address how the MoQ expands and improves Jamesian > philosophical ideas. > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
