[ Horse: I’m answering because I was addressed directly. If you wish *all*
of us to cease, just give me the word. But there has to be equality under
the law. ]
Hi, dmb:
MRB:
> The Nazi Party, the Communist Party, David DuKKKe, Noam "Genocide is
> Understandable" Chomsky, and Bill "Didn’t Make Enough Bombs" Ayers have
> all endorsed the Occupants. That's fine company!
dmb:
If your intention is to appear slightly mad and wildly incoherent,
congratulations on your spectacular success.
That's nice. Since everything I said was accurate and relevant and yet
utterly unreported by the mainstream media, which flips out if one Tea
Partier says some one thing, sanity is now madness and madness, sanity. Be
honest, dmb: if the Nazis and DuKKKe had endorsed the Tea Partiers, the
screaming would be never-ending. You know this. Tell me: where is all that
anxious concern now? The media maintained that Loughner was a Tea Partier
and somehow magically was influenced by a target graphic on an old Sarah
Palin website. And you think that's not biased - or nuts? The MSM rave about
non-existent violence by Tea Partiers and suppresses actual violence by
Occupants.
We're talking about a peaceful
No, we're not. Did you see what's going on in Oakland - paint bombs and
smashing up a police car? New York: drumming at all hours ... defecating on
homeowners' stoops ... invading merchants' shops to use bathrooms despite
not being welcome ... blocking merchants' businesses ... shall we talk about
the knife assault? How about Jews getting nervous at a bit too much
anti-Semitism for their comfort? Or we could talk about horrifying hygiene
issues ... public sex (which as a libertarian I'm kinda okay with, but hey
...) ... drug dealing (in one case, with a 6-yr old kid in the tent) ... a
drunk 11 year old kid ... or the simple fact of occupation, which is *not
peaceful*. Neither is screaming and raised fists. What a testament to our
times: people screaming that they are peaceful.
The right to peaceful assembly does not include the right to occupy public
spaces indefinitely. There is not right to occupy public or non-welcoming
private spaces (whether the group is right or left or center or diagonal).
democratic
That is risible. : ) This is astroturf like never before. Soros is far more
connected to this than the Kochs ever were to the Tea Partiers. Ditto with
the violent wackos Ayers and Dohrn ... an ACORN successor organization
(NTCC) is providing canvassing out of former ACORN offices, using ACORN
letterhead. So is SEIU. Shall I post to you a sliver of just one day's worth
of news about these under-reported aspects? This is the issue where the MSM
finally entirely blew their pretense of any kind of attempt at objectivity.
The MSM treatment of the Occupants has been for the vast part loving and
empathic and bridge-building. Here's one tactic I've documented, having
studied the Occupants from their beginning at Adbusters: at the beginning of
the NY Occupancy, the MSM entirely omitted the most basic and simple element
of reportage for weeks on end: a crowd count. Thus they made it seem larger
than it was. They also avoided photos of the total group, and instead chose
photos that featured drama or charm or ingenious signs, and did not show the
initial small numbers.
Or shall we forget that NYT, NPR, and MSNBC personnel - at least one each -
worked with the Occupants? How would you feel if that were the Tea
Partiers? Oh, but some were freelancers. Funny how none of them helped the
Tea Partiers ...
And vast influxes of union money, coercively extracted from members.
month
A whole month. Wow! Many movements have gone on for a lot longer ...
has spread to a thousand cities all over the world.
Claimed. And in most cases have been spread. In some cases this means a few
dozen people held a march.
They claim to speak for the lower class, the bottom 99%.
* laughter *
Now "the lower class" equals the "bottom 99%!" That's rich. Do you realize
this includes people making $250,000/yr? And how funny that they tell *me*
that they are speaking for me? They aren't. And neither are they speaking
for most. Also, almost every person in the U.S. is in the top 1% worldwide -
so I guess the poorest of all should uprise against us all, yes? We clearly
got rich off of them. (That's the magic process according to Marxist
thought: those who have nothing or little make everyone on top rich. Lol.)
Their radical agenda is to be neither jobless nor homeless.
And to have pink unicorns and white kitties everywhere. Yes, *all* they want
is "neither jobless nor homeless." Have you, by chance, looked at their
demands and agendae? Are you aware that many of them in NY are employed? Do
you know that ~94% actually believe the U.S. spends more on defense than on
welfare?
And you think it's reasonable to say this is class warfare endorsed by
Naezis, Commies, Klansmen, bomb throwers and genocide lovers?
Are you unaware that the David DuKKKe, the Nazis, and the Communists, et.
al., *have* endorsed the Occupants?
Are you listening to yourself?
I'm quite good at that. Are you looking at the ignorance out of which your
accusations leap? Notice how nothing you say has any reference to the world
out there where all this stuff is happening. Typically for the left, you
attempt to accuse me of inner failures - yet you do not know the first thing
other than silly child's tales about the wonderful beautiful things the
Occupants "want" and "aim for."
This is what a child would say after listening to Rush Limbaugh for a
week.
Here's where you and I differ. I would never say you listened, slack-jawed,
to Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow until all your brain cells atrophied.
After all, I might well be wrong. As you are, here, about me. I have
listened to a grand total of about 30 mins of Limbaugh in my life. I don't
like him. And if I did listen to Limbaugh (some leftists do - I know them)
or liked him, what relevance would *that* have? Does it occur to you I'd be
listening to him because of pre-existing sympathy?
Keep up that hating. It's what's behind the Occupants and the organizations
fostering them.
It's certainly possible to talk about Nazis, Commies and democracy within
the context of the MOQ. But childish rants aren't helpful. Quite the
opposite.
Factual claims that go deeply to the point that an organization is not what
it is claimed to be are anything but childish rants. Evasions, sneers, and
childish accusations are, however. So here's to your hopeful maturity, soon.
MRB
http://www.fuguewriter.com
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
