Michael
Perhaps one of my other posts didn't come through or maybe you're
playing some other strange game.
On 26/10/2011 22:27, Horse wrote:
I am not against any discussion that is relevant to the MoQ and is
discussed rationally and reasonably. However I am not going to put up
with the talk radio crap that has been a hallmark of these types of
discussions in the past so anyone joining in here needs to be
coherent, rational and reasonable or they'll be removed from the
discussion.
Being political is not a problem but using the rhetoric of talk-radio
(as used by a previous contributor to this forum - and as heroically
pointed out many times in great depth and detail by Arlo) is not
acceptable.
So, if you choose not to engage because reasonable, rational and
coherent argument and debate is not on your political agenda, that's
fine. But please refrain from attempting to imply that I am censoring
you when what I'm actually doing is stopping you from censoring others
when you refrain from reason and indulge in emotivist nonsense.
Horse
On 27/10/2011 02:00, Michael R. Brown wrote:
Horse:
Very well. Your list, your rules. I will not say a word political again.
I note, en passant, that others are able to, quite irrelevantly to the
MOQ, without trouble.
--
"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines
or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
