Marsha my dear, Are you measuring changeability in meters per second? How do you get distance out of this? Is changeable moving from here to there. OH! There it goes! Another Changeble passing by at the speed of light! Damn those things are hard to catch!
You seem so dismisive about changeable now, yet you yourself profess to be the Queen of Ever-Changeable. Does this make me more changeable than you and your everchanging? Or are you now the ever-unchanging? Is there more quality in the degree of everchanging? Or are you more respectful of the unchanging? Can it be that you are stuck? BTW (another subject just for fun), did you know that the photon does not experience time? At least, that is, according to Einstein's venerated theory of relativity. For his equations to hold, as things get faster time must get smaller (known as time dilation). Until, at the speed of light time stands still. So, the photon is outside of time! That is, as far as the photon is concerned, it is here, there, and everywhere at the same time. We can therefore switch the axis of speed measurement and make the speed of light the relative zero, and our speed becomes relative to that, not as slower than the speed of light, but faster than zero. This makes sense, since time is zero at the speed of light for the photon and we (in the world of time) move according to the photon's frame of reference. Are you with me so far? (In a mystical trance, one could say the mind is moving at the speed of light). The constant speed of a photon is taken as zero and all other speeds are measured relative to that. So, if something goes "faster" than the speed of light (as some now say), and we reverse the frame of relativity (as I explained above), it would mean that something is going slower than zero (again a simple switch in relative frame of reference). The only way I can see that this can happen is by going backwards in time (unless there are a few other components to the equation that can be created, and no doubt will be). If a neutrino is going backwards in time, the speed is negative (slower than zero). What does this mean "to go backwards in time". According to Godel, time is irrelevent. Of course he was a bit odd, but maybe not as odd as these physicists that claim faster than the speed of light (slower than zero). Now, odd is good, it adds to the spice. I like Odd, especially Koontz' character "Odd Thomas". Cheers, Mark On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:01 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > I didn't state as changeable as the speed of light, I said faster. And the > speed of light is constant only in the vacuum of your mind. > > > On Nov 7, 2011, at 12:52 PM, 118 wrote: > >> The speed of light is constant, I guess this means my opinions are constant. >> At least get your metaphors straight. >> >> Mark >> >> On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:50 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:20 AM, 118 wrote: >>> >>>> Mark: >>>> What do you mean And?.. I was answering your question. You tell me >>>> the And... This is another example of defensiveness. You ask a >>>> question, I answer it, and you ask "what's your point?" My reply was >>>> to answer your question. Isn't that the way this works? I thought >>>> maybe your question had a point to it and was not just a method for >>>> sneaking off to a corner and hiding. Or was your question rhetorical >>>> not requiring an answer? >>> >>> Marsha: >>> If this is your idea of producing an answer, I can hardly take your >>> criticisms >>> seriously. Nor will I spend any time defending myself from you calling >>> me defensive. Your labels come and go faster than the speed of light. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> I prefer rocky mountain oysters with a little wasabe. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:40 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 7, 2011, at 1:44 AM, MarshaV wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Mark: >>>>>>> I suppose the standard would be furthering the MoQ through analogy. >>>>>>> Defensiveness is the quality of standing fast to a concept to show one >>>>>>> is unmoved by argument >>>>> >>>>> Marsha: >>>>> And? When an argument is made that moves me, I will acknowledge it. >>>>> Until then keep dreaming of los testículos del toro. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> >>> >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
