On Nov 23, 2011, at 11:41 AM, david buchanan wrote: > > Marsha said to dmb: > What Andre thinks is no more supporting evidence than what you think. > > > dmb says: > That's beside the point.
Marsha: Thinking so is relative to your interests. > dmb: > You suggested that I can't or won't deal with the quote from Ant's MoQ > textbook and so I presented not just evidence but indisputable proof to the > contrary. Marsha: I couldn't find it. I thought my remark might get you to find it. Your dealing with it was not really dealing with it. The phrase "pragmatic notion of truth", with nothing capitalized, does not suggest a formal school of philosophy. I take the phrase to mean a truth based on its usefulness. We know by RMP's complaint about James' Pragmatism and the holocaust that he thought James's pragmatic idea of truth was flawed. > dmb: > The point is to show that your charge is wholly without merit. It's a lie. > You don't have to agree with - or even understand - what Andre and I think. > The point is simply to show that your questions aren't really questions and > to show that I have already dealt with your question. Marsha: I recently posted some quotes that you have blatantly avoided. And you cling to your trumped-up, begging-the-question definition when you know it is nonsense. The point is my question, because you have never delivered a viable response. > dmb: > It doesn't matter to me if you "buy it" or not. Marsha: I don't. > dmb: > If you don't care "what I think", then why do you ask me what I think? Marsha: Because I am interested in the relationship between the MoQ and Buddhism, and understanding the provincial truth is relative truth is important to that relationship. As is the innate tendency towards reification. You matter not an iota. > dmb: > Do you not yet understand that this is why you're called Lucy? Marsha: And this is just one of the reasons I have so little respect for you intellectual competence. When you have no rational argument resort to name calling. > dmb: > If you don't care about the answer, then why ask the question? I'm sick and > tired of your childish games. I think it's pretty obvious that you are not > sincere, honest or even decent. Marsha: This is not about you. This is about the relationship between the MoQ and Buddhism. You don't get the sincerity because you seem to think its about you. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
