Hi Mark and All, MOQ suggests that DQ/SQ describes reality. DQ is indefinable. I accept metaphysics that the reality DQ is indefinable. When I try to piece together metaphysics I go back to what words are a trigger for each level?
I accept that DQ is indefinable. When I compare DQ to stated reality I examine Emotions. Emotions are indefinable. However, thoughts, sensations, words, used in communication are definable. How are emotions different? I am content that MOQ, DQ(as emotions)/SQ, accepts that some levels in reality are indefinable. I think of Heroes, and I accept the possibility that higher emotional and higher intellectual values may also be indefinable. The reality of Metaphysics formats language. An appeal to the language Physics which follows a strict logic of mathematics, may reveal the hiding place for Metaphysics, the language of evolution. What is logic? Joe On 12/16/11 2:53 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > Reality IS indefinable since words are only a small part of reality. > The rest has no words associated with it, and therefore cannot be > defined. In the same way, our reality is only a small part of > Reality. (No, we do not create Reality, Reality creates with us. We > are not so powerful. For indeed, how would it be that we create > Reality? What tools do we use for such construction? We are the > tools). So, reality being indefinable is just "common sense" to me > anyway. Just because reality is undefined does not mean that we > cannot participate in it and influence it. For that is what we do. > > Hope this clears up what I am presenting (as an opinion). I got a bit > carried away... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
