Hi Mark and all, Metaphysics is a format. Physics follows the defined description of a format. Meaning in DQ/SQ follows the format where one aspect of knowledge is indefinable by individualization. In evolution 1 is not definable and mathematical logic is inadequate. In analogy and metaphor true terms exist and are knowable even though indefinable. Agreement is necessary in discussing DQ/SQ since there is no possibility for certainty when discussing an indefinable in a closed logic. A better idea is usually around the corner like DQ/SQ. Doing one's best is the condition of metaphysical logic as opposed to a computer's relational mathematical logic in physics.
My interpretation of the metaphysics of quality DQ/SQ follows a paradigm. Meaning lies in the format not an individual interpretation which must remain DQ since there are no indefinable words. Meaning is not an agreement between individuals but the acceptance of DQ/SQ metaphysics MOQ which in my opinion must include evolution. IMHO Meaning follows evolution. You disavow indefinable meaning in communication, and put the burden of interpretation on the reader to understand your use of words instead of appealing to the individualized metaphysics of evolution that you are using. A hint to how you view the knowledge of an indefinable reality would be useful. Joe On 2/20/12 9:06 AM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > I will do my best to try to explain, but any meaning in my words must > come from you who bring them alive when you read them. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
