On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Can I conceptualize will following the template provided by the intellect? > How would will ever recognize such a template? A cart before the horse > problem since will determines my actions while psychology describes them. > Determination follows description follows reality.
I think that you can represent Will with the intellect. I am not sure if recognition is an element of substance. Sure it can be considered as the cart before the horse. I prefer to think of it as reflection. The reflection is only a reflection. > > Evolution as levels in existence opens a door by questioning whether one > size existence fits all. For myself I try to prefer a definition for > evolution to follow the realization of levels in existence. Man and woman > are different yet determined in human existence. Existence is meaningful! That definition is fine by me. > > Adding sentience to the nature of existence becomes a stretch! Well, all I can say is that we did not get our sentience out of the blue. We are not Gods. I suppose it all depends on how one defines sentience. Human sentience could be one form of sentience. Mark > > > On 2/29/12 2:48 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Modern >> psychology is stuck in the evolution paradigm, so it is easy to see >> where it will end up. In a dead niche somewhere due to >> overspecialization... > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
