Marsha to Andre:
What does 'radical empiricism' mean for you?
Andre:
Typical of you isn't it? Responding to my (or for that matter anyone's)
assertions, especially those that challenge your delusions/misapprehensions,
with a question without even addressing the assertions themselves. This is
exactly what I mean by 'slithering'.
But I'll bite and put it in a nutshell: "To be radical, an empiricism must neither
admit into its constructions any element that is not directly experienced, nor exclude
from them any element that is directly experienced". (Anthony's PhD, p 48)
Now, are you going to respond to the assertions or are you going to slither
away again? I'll repeat them below for easy reference:
1) You deny the existence of the self/ego.(and please remember Anthony's
comment re your DQ/sq)
(In the MOQ the 'self' is a 'jungle' of static patterns of value capable of
apprehending Dynamic
Quality)
2) There is no "I" in mindfulness. (I claim this to be delusional).
3) Your Buddhism is of the boomeritis variety. "Keep your filthy hands off my
desert" and "it's my
reality so fuck off". (Your behavior on this discuss is a prime example).
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
