Hi Andre, > David to Andre: > Is a 'referring term' not a definition? I think to some degree that it is.. > > Andre: > Well, I beg to differ David. I do not think that by referring to [DQ] you in > any way,shape or form are already defining it.Rather the referral is made > from that which it is not. The referring is a finger pointing to...
Right. But how can you even talk of DQ without referring to it? You can't do it. From the perspective of sq, even the words Dynamic Quality are a sort of definition. The term is a static and defined thing. And this, being static, is of course, not DQ. Remember the Laws of Gravity in ZMM? Similarly, Dynamic Quality didn't exist until Pirsig defined it by giving it a name. -David. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
