Hi Joe, For me, Evolution is a description of a manner of change. The term Evolution is meant to convey much more than the existence of four levels. It is meant to convey the principle of directionality. That would be the tendency to higher qualities.
Value in evolution could be depicted in the paradigm of survival. Therefore, the metaphorical levels within MoQ, and, the rhetorical impact of a word such as "evolution" exist as the current best persuasive telling of Static Quality. This will change, of course, due to the pressures of betterness. By definition, MoQ is a work in progress. In my opinion, Evolution is not the levels, but what creates the levels. We do not consider the modern version of the horse to BE evolution, because it is static. I believe that Value between what one can define and what one cannot (definable/indefinable) is the same as the value between boundaries and "no boundaries". The definable is confined and the indefinable is not. Personal valuation of these two states, depends on how one uses them. As I see it, DQ is not individuality but that from which individuality comes. Take for example the experience of a roller coaster. Each ride is an individual experience, but Experience cannot be confined. We can say that Experience is common to us individuals, but individual experiences are not. One is foundational, the other is ornamental. I liked your statement about male and female. Cheers, Mark On 5/23/12, Joseph Maurer <jh...@comcast.net> wrote: > Hi Jan and all, > > I am trying to understand a value in evolution. The value between > defineable and indefinable is negation. Evolution is not negation. > Existence is logically perceived in different formats, DQ/SQ. I do not > want > to view DQ as individuality, but rather as common to sentient individuals. > > My impulse views evolution as levels in existence. Male and female humans > exhibit common functions in sentience, and their differences are not > evolutionary but individualized for the continuation of the species. > > Joe > > > On 5/22/12 1:36 PM, "Jan-Anders Andersson" <janander...@telia.com> wrote: > >> The bigger the difference between Dynamic and Static Quality, the bigger >> is >> the mathematical Value of DQ/SQ, i e the urge to invoke to start a >> process, an >> event or a change. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
