Cheers Marsha, That is what it is all about. We learn from each other. Agreement is static.
Thank you. Sent laboriously from an iPhone, Mark On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:42 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for an opinion. I offered mine. You offered yours. Great! > > > Marsha > > > > > On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:15 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Marsha, >> >> I beg to differ. Quality is a relationship one can have with >> existence. You won't know it until you have been there. DQ is part >> of that relationship. Of course it is not an intellectual thingy like >> you say, but that is not everything, now is it? Just like you cannot >> find the self with the intellect, you cannot find Quality with the >> intellect. You are just looking for love in all the wrong places... >> Just stop this logical nonsense. >> >> By the way, I was not speaking of an "experience", that sounds like >> some kind of static psychology. Like some kind of brain fart. Get >> beyond that. >> >> It depend not on one's history, never has. DQ is what creates that >> history. It is not an Aha, never was, that is the result of DQ. You >> are approaching this in the wrong way, completely (in my humble >> opinion). MoQ has not gotten anywhere since Pirsig's pronouncements. >> What kind of metaphysics is that? Sounds more like a tombstone. "He >> tried to explain Qyality, and they put him on a shelf". >> >> Just think of it as a relationship with your own existence. That >> thing which creates your thoughts and emotions and all else. >> >> What happens when there is not SQ around? I suppose you will never >> know, because you keep boxing everything in. There is much more than >> your intellectual musings. They are like frost on a window. >> >> Cheers, >> Mark >> >> On 6/21/12, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Joe & Mark, >>> >>> Dynamic Quality isn't any thing. It isn't 'dark night', or chaos; it is >>> unpatterned; it is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable. I would imagine >>> that there might be different responses in relationship to such experiences, >>> and a dark night funk might be one of them, but not necessarily. Wouldn't >>> it depend on one's static pattern history and the dynamics of the event(s)? >>> A monk having spent a lifetime in a monastery might react with AHA! Someone >>> from a hyper-rational environment might react with a OMG! >>> >>> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
