On Jul 9, 2012, at 4:33 AM, "Carl Thames" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> dmb,
>>
>> Not the quote or the article even used the word 'undifferentiated' except
>> the Zen quote that you presented associating it with nirvana. I take
>> 'undifferentiate' to mean lacking difference or distinction. My statement
>> still stands that if Dynamic Quality is undifferentiated, it cannot be about
>> perceptions (smells, sounds, tastes, visions, and feelings) which are
>> differentiated; which require a spacial-temporal framework; and which are
>> dependent on human sense apparatus? Dynamic Quality is indivisible,
>> undefinable and unknowable; it is undifferentiated; it is not perceptions -
>> not smells, not sounds, not taste, not visions, and not feelings.
>>
>> Marsha
>
> Then how do you know it when you see it?
>
> Carl
>
Hi Carl,
Know it? See it? - 'Not this, not that.' might be considered an insight.
Marsha
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
