Hey Mark

Sorry about your father. I can see that you are really far out, trapped into 
something dangerous for you. You are a smart person that can make more people 
happy somewhere else than here.

Stop your worries about MOQ before your brain gets overloaded, take a serious 
brake, get a hobby, start baking cakes, play the guitar, with girls or do just 
whatever but not this. Don't write, don't read, use your senses, your hands and 
your feet.

Best wishes and welcome back later

Jan Anders

21 jul 2012 kl. 10.01 skrev 118:

>>> Mark suggests:
>>> The point is to free oneself from the static.  As you have stated
>>> yourself, "beginner's mind".  Treat each post as something new,
>>> without all that baggage that one brings with one.  Look beyond static
>>> quality.  Look beyond the words in Lila and try to see what the
>>> intentions of them were.  Words are just words, it is what the reader
>>> does with them that matters.
>>> 
>>> Ant counters:
>>> As I've said earlier, the reader is only half the story as regards a
>>> piece of writing.  Otherwise, Hemingway would have never bothered writing 
>>> (to
>>> himself - in order to help maintain the quality of his writing) in "A
>>> Moveable Feast": "All you have to do is write one true sentence.  Write
>>> the truest sentence you know."
> 
> Mark provides a comment to Ant's counter:
> This Hemingway example is very misguided.  Hemingway had no power over
> the individual who reads his  books.  The Quality of Hemingway's
> writing is a result of people liking his style.  The manner with which
> he writes is inherent to his own creativity and discipline.  If you
> find it to be of high quality, then good for you.  I have to assume
> you are not telling others that they should view it as high quality,
> for that would be contrary to MoQ.  There is no truth to what is
> better.  It is all about Quality.
> 
> You should know better than to bring Truth into this discussion.
> "True" should be replaced with "Quality", and then we revert to
> Pirisg's quote on knowing what is good and bad.  Or does "the" MOQ
> have nothing to do with what Pirsig has written?

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to