Jan-Anders,
Your observation and advice would be mirroring what? Marsha On Jul 21, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Jan Anders Andersson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Mark > > Sorry about your father. I can see that you are really far out, trapped into > something dangerous for you. You are a smart person that can make more people > happy somewhere else than here. > > Stop your worries about MOQ before your brain gets overloaded, take a serious > brake, get a hobby, start baking cakes, play the guitar, with girls or do > just whatever but not this. Don't write, don't read, use your senses, your > hands and your feet. > > Best wishes and welcome back later > > Jan Anders > > 21 jul 2012 kl. 10.01 skrev 118: > >>>> Mark suggests: >>>> The point is to free oneself from the static. As you have stated >>>> yourself, "beginner's mind". Treat each post as something new, >>>> without all that baggage that one brings with one. Look beyond static >>>> quality. Look beyond the words in Lila and try to see what the >>>> intentions of them were. Words are just words, it is what the reader >>>> does with them that matters. >>>> >>>> Ant counters: >>>> As I've said earlier, the reader is only half the story as regards a >>>> piece of writing. Otherwise, Hemingway would have never bothered writing >>>> (to >>>> himself - in order to help maintain the quality of his writing) in "A >>>> Moveable Feast": "All you have to do is write one true sentence. Write >>>> the truest sentence you know." >> >> Mark provides a comment to Ant's counter: >> This Hemingway example is very misguided. Hemingway had no power over >> the individual who reads his books. The Quality of Hemingway's >> writing is a result of people liking his style. The manner with which >> he writes is inherent to his own creativity and discipline. If you >> find it to be of high quality, then good for you. I have to assume >> you are not telling others that they should view it as high quality, >> for that would be contrary to MoQ. There is no truth to what is >> better. It is all about Quality. >> >> You should know better than to bring Truth into this discussion. >> "True" should be replaced with "Quality", and then we revert to >> Pirisg's quote on knowing what is good and bad. Or does "the" MOQ >> have nothing to do with what Pirsig has written? > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
