Marsha to dmb: Are those quotes somehow suppose to represent some kind of evidence? Guess, Baby, guess! No clearly articulated premises, no clearly explained evidence, no direct conclusion, and absolutely no argument.
You keep repeating the same intellectual malfunctioning. It's boring. I am personally quite tired of you groundless attacks. If others find you fascinating, that's fine with me. Andre: A lovely counter argument Marsha is using to not defend her assertions against coherently presented counter (MoQ-founded) arguments is to say these ' counters' are ' out of context', ' not referring to the same post (or subject heading) ' mere opinion' , ' chopped up' and lots of other nonsense she uses to avoid providing a decent defense against those counter arguments. Marsha used, not many posts ago the defense ' I know nothing' . My question is: Is this to be taken as a general statement (which it very clearly implies)?. Is it possible for this defense to be taken ' out of context' , to be ' chopped up' , to not refer to any ' direct conclusion' , to be used ' without argument' , to be used without foundation' , does one need to mention the MoQ in this instance, are we to ' guess Baby guess????????? It is once more an indication of being unable to sustain her own assertions in the context of MoQ founded arguments criticizing these assertions and pointing her in the MoQ direction. The counterarguments Marsh is using are a cynical and cowardly way to ' settle' a critique of her position. She darn well knows this and therefore it is intellectual dishonesty of the worst kind. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
