Hi Mark and All, I agree Creation from nothing is beyond my capabilities. I can accept a creative arrangement for existing DQ/SQ, the ghost MOQ.
Joe On 8/24/12 5:01 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Joe, > I am not sure about the emptiness. It is only empty if you expect to find > some thing. As it is, we create such things. We do not create them out of > nothing. So it is far from empty. > > Consider the ghost (or structure) of reason. We build it. We do not replace > emptiness with this ghost. MOQ is such a ghost. What we are is creativity. > > > Mark > > On Aug 24, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> O as nothing is indefinable. O as pre-intellectual is open to an emotional >> emptiness, perception, enabling Pirsig to describe metaphysics as DQ/SQ. >> >> Joe >> >> >> On 8/23/12 9:40 PM, "118" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> However, you point out a difference, in common perception, between >>> physics and metaphysics when you state that DQ cannot be assigned a >>> value. However, if you think about it, what is zero? Basically it is >>> the absence of "Some Thing". We could say that DQ is also the absence >>> of "Some Thing". So I wouldn't necessarily say that they are not an >>> expression for the same "thing". >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
