David & dmb,
I value more highly discussing the MoQ's static (patterned) quality - (static
patterns of value) - rather than the particular intellectual static pattern
labeled 'truth'. I have nothing to say about 'truth'; I prefer to use RMP's
term 'pattern' rather than 'truth', and I prefer think of patterns as
'hypothetical'.
Marsha
On Aug 30, 2012, at 11:40 PM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi dmb,
>
snip...
> Yes, I appreciate that. When Marsha says that she doesn't value truth -
> that is indeed showing great disrespect to intellectual value. We both
> agree that truth is a description for high quality patterns. If Marsha does
> not value truth or would like to de-emphasise it and(to be precise) replace
> it with 'hypothetical' then she doesn't value high quality intellectual
> patterns...
>
snip...
>
> Thanks dmb,
>
> -David.
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
