Marsha said to dmb:
Why is it that nine out of ten of your posts include some attack on my
statements or me?
dmb says:
Because your statements are full of contradictory nonsense, wild distortions
and other kinds of errors, obviously. There would be no point in attacking
clear, coherent statements, obviously. If there were 70 hours a day, I still
wouldn't have enough time to correct all of your mistakes, but I do what I can.
By the way, the phrase "dear reader" is used to indicate that the comment is
being addressed to anyone who is reading the comment. As far as I know, it has
never been used to add authority to anything or anyone. I can even imagine how
that would that work.
Marsha said to dmb:
Gotta love your "truths are true" statement. Great clarity! And the "in
relation to experience" is just your cowardly way of avoiding the word
'relative'.
dmb says:
Absolutism and relativism are polar opposites. Pragmatism is neither. It is the
middle way as it sits between those polar opposites.
The statement (truths are true in relation to experience) has nothing to do
with relativism. It is a claim about the relationship between static quality
and Dynamic Quality. It is a statement about where truth fits within the
structure of the MOQ. It's not surprising that would misunderstand this and
issue another bogus statement that's so obviously worthy of criticism. Just
about everything you say needs to be corrected. What's worse, you dismiss these
corrections without ever addressing them or even understanding them. These
errors pile up and get all tangled up in each other so that the confusion is
deep and knotted and gnarly. I doubt if you'll ever find your way out of that
mountainous mess, but I do what I can.
You're welcome.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
