Marsha,
How do I know?  You said so.  We're you lying (again)?

Mark

On Oct 16, 2012, at 1:10 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On Oct 16, 2012, at 1:29 PM, 118 wrote:
> 
>> Marsha,
>> Your concern for suffering is misplaced.  I exist without static patterns.  
>> Nor do I have much to gain from senseless quibbling.  You did not provide an 
>> answer to JA, all you provided was provocation.  
> 
> Really?  How do you know?  Are you projecting again?  Did some pattern enter 
> your consciousness and you mistook it to be reality?   
> 
> 
> Marsha 
> 
> 
> 
>> You can present anything you want.  Any discussion requires one to provide 
>> justification.  This is something you haven't learned yet.  All this street 
>> brawling of yours is simply attention getting behavior.  How about you 
>> present something of substance that comes from your own mind?  We can all 
>> search the Internet for quotes.  It is how we interpret those quotes that is 
>> interesting.
>> 
>> Please provide an answer to your own questions.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> On Oct 15, 2012, at 10:48 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Mark,
>>> 
>>> And just as I thought.  You are so predictable!  You confirm merely your 
>>> projections, which you confuse with an external reality.
>>> 
>>> You seem to be a naive realist who takes the patterns that flit through 
>>> your mind as reality, or "truth." That you find your automatic writing 
>>> meaningful, is nice for you, but It very seldom makes any sense to me, nor 
>>> do your judgements of myself or others.  
>>> 
>>> So judge away...  So confirm away...  Not a problem for me.  You do not 
>>> need to answer my questions, nor do I need answer yours.   
>>> 
>>> I answered Jan-Anders.  If you didn't like my answer, I can only tell you 
>>> that it was not meant to make you suffer.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 15, 2012, at 3:59 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Marsha,
>>>> Just as I thought.  You are so predictable!  Coming out of your hole, 
>>>> teasing the cats and then scurrying back into your nest, with that 
>>>> satisfied grin on your face.
>>>> 
>>>> You have confirmed your intentions which is all that I sought.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Mark
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 15, 2012, at 1:22 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark,
>>>>> 
>>>>> You seem to have your homunculus in a bunch; I am not interested in the 
>>>>> ravings of such a creature.   
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marsha 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 15, 2012, at 2:58 AM, 118 wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Marsha,
>>>>>> Why should I consider that?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am waiting for answers to you two questions.  Or were they just 
>>>>>> presented so you could bitch at somebody.  Do you have anything original 
>>>>>> going on in that pretty little head of yours.  I am convinced that you 
>>>>>> do not understand the quotes you paste since you have never given me 
>>>>>> reason to do so.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But who knows.  Could you explain those quotes to me in your own words?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Didn't think so.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Besides, that is not what Buddhists see.  You are being misled.  Or 
>>>>>> perhaps I am wrong again.  What Buddhist do you know who see things that 
>>>>>> way?  I know plenty of Buddhist who don't.  They are pretty straight 
>>>>>> forward.  I attend their temples, and celebrations.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hagen is stuck in some glorified intellectual nonsense.  If what they 
>>>>>> see is illusory, they are trying to escape into some kind of la la land, 
>>>>>> because they are suffering from the delusion that they are suffering.  
>>>>>> You buy into this whole suffering nonsense.  They are only suffering if 
>>>>>> they think they are suffering, just like you must feel you are suffering 
>>>>>> and therefore lash out on contributors to this forum.  You suffering is 
>>>>>> an illusion, remember.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Why would Hagen write a book if his words were illusory?   Maybe you 
>>>>>> should ask that pompous wannabe.  His world may be illusory because he 
>>>>>> is so confused.  Here he is, writing a book for one of his illusions.  
>>>>>> Must be lonely in that ivory tower.  He has nothing to teach his 
>>>>>> illusion since it is a projection of his mind.  How nihilistic, writing 
>>>>>> a book for no reason.  Writing that it is illusion, but living as if it 
>>>>>> were real.  He has tied himself up in knots.  Something is very wrong 
>>>>>> with that kind of person.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Stop reading and do some thinking for a change.  You will find it 
>>>>>> refreshing to be in the real world.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:19 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mark,  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here's something for you to consider:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "When buddhas look at the world, they don't _see_ solidity.  They don't 
>>>>>>> _see_ selves_.  They see only flux.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "This is not to say that the awakened no longer see forms like the rest 
>>>>>>> of us.  They do.  But they _see_ forms --- or, rather, "formness" --- 
>>>>>>> as illusory.  They _see_ that all things arise together.  They _see_ 
>>>>>>> that the apparent existence of anything is dependent on all that it is 
>>>>>>> not.  And they _see_ this dependence as nothing other than change and 
>>>>>>> motion themselves.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "The Buddha called this phenomena dependent arising.  Dependent arising 
>>>>>>> is the formula, "When this arises, that becomes."  When the days 
>>>>>>> lengthen, spring flowers bloom.  When days shorten, autumn colors 
>>>>>>> appear and leaves fall from the trees.  Spring flowers are inseparable 
>>>>>>> from lengthening days; autumn colors are inseparable from days of less 
>>>>>>> and less light.  Indeed, spring flowers _are_ the longer days; fall 
>>>>>>> colors _are_ the shorter days.  In Reality, all phenomena work together 
>>>>>>> as a seamless whole. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Dependent arising is not vague, mystical, remote, intellectual stuff.  
>>>>>>> The buddha-dharma is very practical and down-to-earth.  Just pay very 
>>>>>>> close attention to your actual experience, and you'll _see_ it for 
>>>>>>> yourself."  
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (Hagen, Steve, ‘Buddhism: Plain and Simple’, p.146)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 11:15 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Mark:
>>>>>>>> Given the nature of your response to me and Jan Anders, I can see that 
>>>>>>>> you only wish to find fault in others.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Can you not participate without being bitchy?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Why can't first answer the questions rather than always being on the 
>>>>>>>> attack?  You come across as a very resentful.  What happened to you 
>>>>>>>> that you are this way?  Surely you can't have any close friends, the 
>>>>>>>> way you treat people.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Oct 14, 2012, at 9:11 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Marsha
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ___
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>> Archives:
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to