Howdy people

Some week ago I presented an experiment with a portrait of yourself and a 
mirror. The experiment was to put them beside each other and to try to find out 
something about the different pictures.

I have got an advantage over most of the members here and that is that English 
is not my native language. This means that I have to decode the letters and 
words two levels down, until it reaches my thinking level, deep inside my 
brain. I have to put some kind of filter or decoder between me and the message. 
Usually I have to read the message a couple of times. In that process I am very 
clear that the original order of the letters and words in the message will be 
kept and preserved for a very long period. That is how static, a message, a 
literary picture, a pattern, can be. But every time I reread it, the encoded 
text I get into my mind will be put together with my former reading and mixed 
together into a deeper understanding. In that way the message will continue to 
change, in my search for the True meaning of the message.

People are different and so are bathrooms. Most bathrooms are equipped with at 
least one mirror. Some bathroom mirrors are covered by a huge smiley or a photo 
of a film star to disquise the real picture of the spectator. But you all know 
how hard it will be to comb your face in front of that.
Some bathrooms have no mirror, the user is left to use the weak shadow in the 
window glass or lift the lid and look down into the small round surface to get 
a picture of him self. Sad for him if he live in an area without water closets.

So in this moment of 'shootgun-philosophy', isn't it just correct to ask any 
person coming out from the bathroom: "Are you experienced?" (I never understood 
the title of that album but I like the music)               (Space left here 
for a internet link to Jimi Hendrix)

Dmb talks about the mirror itself, Ant describes the whole bathroom and some 
other are still looking deep into the hole, while others have jumped out 
through the open window....  Marsha seem to admit that there is change (and 
time), but she still doesn't accept the picture.

There is something interesting in mirrors however, so here is another sport you 
can try at home:
Because it is possible to use a mirror in angles from 0° close to 180°, you 
aren't obliged to look straight into it. It is possible to look into it from an 
angle. By that, the mirror will show you something else than your own face. You 
make your choice and get the picture.

In World War One the periscope was used as an information apparatus that could 
tell something about the world up there without risk for the user.

My point is that text, messages and literature are like mind mirrors or 
philosophical periscopes. The message's components is as usual arranged and 
kept in strict static order and it is up to the reader to decode the picture he 
gets. It is very useful to have some kind of distance to the matter and not 
only look at the frame of the mirror. The actual content of the book is the 
same but the picture and the understanding of the book is all in change, in 
motion, time is running. So where are we going? Who is to decide what steps to 
take?

We are using mirrors when we back our cars but we need no mirror to drive 
forward, we need a map, a reason and a plan, where to go.
LILA is kind of a mind mirror that shows anyone of us a picture over the 
conditions behind the evolution, but we decide by our SELF what steps to take 
from that. By these decisions we are defining our self. Just as static quality 
emanates from dynamic quality. And as I told you in MALC, there are a lot of 
warning lamps on the way to excellence.

:-)

JanAnders
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to