Nice piece of change, Marsha

JanAnders

7 mar 2013 kl. 08:23 skrev MarshaV <[email protected]>:

> 
> dmb,
> 
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 1:42 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Static patterns are static and they're patterned no matter how many times 
>> she [Marsha] uses the phrase "ever-changing static patterns". In a hundred 
>> years, that will still be a stupid thing to say.
> 
> If putting that on quotes was to signify it was a phrase I used, you are 
> misrepresenting for a reason I cannot fathom.  My explanation/definition of 
> static patterns of value is:  
> 
> -- Static patterns of value are repetitive processes, conditionally 
> co-dependent, impermanent and ever-changing, that pragmatically tend to 
> persist and change within a stable, predictable pattern.  Within the MoQ, 
> these patterns are morally categorized into a four-level, evolutionary, 
> hierarchical structure:  inorganic, biological, social and intellectual. 
> Static quality exists in stable patterns relative to other patterns:  
> patterns depend upon ( exist relative to) innumerable causes and conditions 
> (patterns), depend upon (exist relative to) parts and the collection of parts 
> (patterns), depend upon (exist relative to) conceptual designation 
> (patterns). Patterns have no independent, inherent existence.  Further, these 
> patterns pragmatically exist relative to an individual's static pattern of 
> life history. -- 
> 
> And I use the term 'ever-changing' because patterns of value are both static 
> AND ever-changing as I have explained many times.    Each time a pattern 
> momentarily interacts with consciousness it is different than the time 
> before, and if you have an experience with a pattern in any other way than as 
> an interaction with consciousness, please explain how that happens.  A little 
> patience and introspection would help you see this; that's _see_ as in 
> insight.  But maybe like James you will meet a gumption trap and give up, and 
> stay self-involved with your static rambling thoughts.  And they will forever 
> have you.  My explanation/definition is meant to point as far away from 
> 'inherently existing' as possible.  I think that that is most important.  
> That static patterns of value are ever-changing agrees with my experience, 
> which not confused with the static representation of words on a page.  
> 
> 
> Marsha 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to