Hello Joe,
I understand the fundamental nature of static quality (determinate) to be
Dynamic Quality (indeterminate). With this being a good analogy of that
relationship.
"Water is distinct from ice, but in the ice cube it is present: not as a fly
might be trapped there, but _in the very ice_. And yet when the ice cube is
gone, the water remains. Although we see water as ice, we do so not because it
is there separately, to be seen from behind or apart from the cube."
(Iain McGilchrist, 'The MASTER and his EMISSARY:
The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World', p. 452).
Marsha
On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Joseph Maurer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi MarshaV and All,
>
> I am confused!
>
> Do you view dynamic (indefinable) quality and static (definable) quality as
> having the same fundamental nature and only a difference in time or location
> for definition?
>
> I observe a value in the definition of perception (individual) as different
> from the definition of the conception of creation or evolution.
>
> IMHO
> Metaphysical DQ/SQ makes possible an evolution of levels in existence.
>
> Joe
>
>
> On 3/28/13 8:53 AM, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> For me, this is a good analogy for 'the fundamental nature of static quality
>> is Dynamic Quality.'
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
