Dan-Adrie Your son seems very bright. You must be proud of him. Yes, I think that's right. With the MOQ, the challenge seems to lie in seeking out the new rather than comparing it to what has come before. By reducing the MOQ to what is known, we effectively dismiss it.
--------------------------------------- Thanks , Dan, yes, he's a programmer and has a full-time job here as software support engineer, but also works for an American company that is launching the Cockoo (tm)watch on the mercan market.currently they work on the bluetooth connectivity, he works from here on that project. My daughter has a very good job on the university here as a jobcoach. My son bought Mc Watts introduction into the..., without telling me anyway, because he likes zam,and was reading along on this forum when Mr Buchanan or you or Arlo or Andre presented something Probably he wants to catch up with me,without telling me in so many words he has not a clear vision on on the framework Phaedrus is carrying,i told him he needs to read Plato first, symposium etc, heck of a job without .whilst reading Plato's cave he made the analogy- Pirsig talking to Chris true the glass in zam, two different reality's, immidiate insight!nice.... Sometimes i considered to make him post here, but with Krimel's drivel and the conversation about scatalogy,mmm not a good idea. Have to say, Mr Buchanan was not wrong to spook him so hard.Krimel is a frustro. about the Moq. So many unseen content is still there. But these crap wars..........nobody will come here to learn things. numbness;madness;hemptiness. an example, simple this my sentence to Marsha, "nobody wants to get fucked in a rational manner" and Yesterday Pirsig /Buchanan Pirsig says his central aim is to show how "RATIONALITY can be tremendously improved, expanded and made far more effective through a formal recognition of Quality in its operation." (ZAMM 278, emphasis is mine) It's not just a new philosophy, he says, it's "even broader than that - new form of spiritual RATIONALITY". (ZAMM 358, emphasis is Pirsig's) "He did nothing for Quality or the Tao. What benefited was reason." (ZAMM 257) "Reason and Quality had become separated and in conflict with each other" (ZAMM 358) back in the days of Plato. "It's been necessary since before the time of Socrates to reject the passions, the emotions, in order to free the rational mind for an understanding of nature's order", Pirsig says, but now it's time for "reassimilating those passions which were originally fled from. The passions, the emotions, the affective domain of man's consciousness, are a part of nature's order too. The central part." (ZAMM 294) ----------------------- Marsha had no idea what i was talking about, however Mr buchanan is pinpointing immidiately what i was talking about. there is a reason to read books , people! and to study what is presented.write books of your own if you disagree. Thanks for reading Dan Adrie 2013/4/24 MarshaV <[email protected]> > > Hi Ian, > > On Apr 24, 2013, at 4:46 AM, Ian Glendinning <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Since when was "know-nothing troll" a valid argument on MD ? > > > It is also reifying a mere flow of ever-changing, conditionally > co-dependent and impermanent static patterns: inorganic patterns, > biological patterns, social patterns and intellectual patterns of value > flowing within the infinite field of Dynamic Quality. > > > Marsha > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
