> [Marsha] > I asked the question to hear the different replies that might be offered?
Marsha: Judgement calls of how a text is 'artfully' or 'artlessly' deployed are based on the results of everyone's different history and current patterns of value. You might call that 'contextual', or possibly 'relative' or 'subjective'. x-man sez: AHHH your true intention is revealed in your baited question. What your point to Horse, IS, What is considered philosophical is subjective and relative And he can go pound sand.... I'm guessin you can think again.. You just might have yanked your last football on this Forum Lucy.. Having said that, lets examine your question. "Is this quote philosophical" since philosophy is supposed to clarify thoughts, one must ask exactly what thought the quote is supposed to clarify in order for it to serve a "philosophical" purpose. This was omitted, the criticism is leveled at this omission as an incomplete philosophical assertion, one can not say one way or another because of this omission. It has nothing to do with the subjectivity of what is philosophical at this point, it has not even reached this point yet and the fact you do not even recognize this calls into question your ability to make quality intellectual judgements. If you can not make quality intellectual judgements and you cant say what is philosophic and you emphatically believe no one can......why oh why are you here? ..anyone? .. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
