Ron said June 23rd 2013:
> Well, that was Lila's whole problem, attachment to the death of her child.
> She avoided dealing with it and she lapsed into a psychosis (what Joe
> Campbell would describe as also a breaking from cultural patterns.) This is
> where I interpret Bob really making his point about letting go of the stuff
> that drives you mad what ever it may be, clearing out that "stuckness" that
> gumption trap that keeps you from really actively engaging in the now of
> experience.
>
>
> To actively engage in the now of experience requires sustaining biological
> and social patterns. The arful mechanic works on the cycle of the self. What
> I was asking Dmb and Ant about was what tools they thought Bob contributed to
> the Philosophic garage. Something within a general outline like: I. To solve
> a problem one must first see it. 1. Once seen let go of all attacments to it.
> II. Developing care (mindful of the now) 1. Re evaulate the meaning in terms
> of biological and social value. 2. Act. Rinse and repeat. I see Bob and
> pragmatism as really contributing in regard to II.1 and would like to see it
> outlined with a little more clarity.
>
>
>
> dmb said June 30th 2013:.
Sorry, Ron, but I still don't understand what you're saying.
Ron originally said to DMB, June 18th 2013:
Seeing how this topic of conversation gets derailed
and hijacked
by the 180 degree point of view...
Ant McWatt comments:
OK, Ron, for the supposed sake of this clarity you're after, let's start from
the top!
Firstly, what do YOU mean by "the 180 degree point of view"?
Best wishes,
Ant
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
