[David]
But sadly, if you feel that this discussion has ran its course then so be it 
but I have found it very rewarding.  I enjoy the challenge of explaining myself 
and I can't say enough how much I've appreciated your openness towards what 
I've been saying. 

[Arlo]
See, David, you say this, but all you've done is exactly restate the exact 
points I've already responded to. All you've done is simply say "you're 
speaking statically" over and over, as if this makes sense.

First, it confuses Paul's point into "static and Dynamic". So let's go back 
there first and clear that up. The "two contexts" Paul spoke of are related to 
experience. In one, maybe the "ZMM context" although even this is a little 
simplistic, patterns emanate from the experiential moment. There is no 
evolutionary timeline where inorganic patterns precede biological patterns. 
Both emerge simultaneously from the moment of experience. In the second, maybe 
the "LILA context", we have the evolutionary trajectory of Quality, wherein it 
makes sense to say "inorganic patterns preceded biological patterns. As I've 
said, this is a bit simplistic, but the conflation you've made to "static 
context" and "Dynamic context" makes no sense. 

Second, you continue to use "killing patterns" as the purpose for engagement in 
a philosophy forum, suggesting again that its just that I don't understand you 
mean "quieting". Of course I do. Let's use the example you brought up, the tea 
ceremony. In this, the patterns that are "put to sleep" are the habituated 
activity of the ceremony. During the ceremony, the participants are on such 
auto-pilot that they have NO CONSCIOUS AWARENESS of their activity. Even the 
mechanic in Pirsig's example has hit a state of mastery where he is performing 
actions without being consciously aware of them. Is this what you're 
suggesting, that we master these ideas so well we can participate here without 
being consciously aware we are doing so?

A few weeks ago, out for a ride, I was actually mulling over some ideas I am 
working on regarding Vygotsky's writings. At one point, about 30 minutes later, 
I stopped for gas and realized I had no mental recollection of the last 30 
minutes. I navigated down a ravine into the little town of Sinnemahoning, my 
mind undistracted by attending to the riding, it became a 'ceremony' and left 
me free to follow Dynamic Quality. When was the last time you participated here 
and later realized you had no recollection of it, you know you did it, but you 
did it on such a mastery-habituated level that you paid it no conscious 
awareness at all?

And, the tea ceremony works in this abstract "non-evolutionary" sense because 
it is such a controlled experience. There is no 'broken cup' that needs to be 
fixed, or 'something wrong' with the tea leaves that needs to be figured out. 
This is, to me, precisely the sort of artificial and detached activity that 
takes 'everyday living' out of the equation. If your misunderstood 'dynamic 
context' has at its goal the state of perpetual and ongoing meditation, the 
quieting of patterns as an end in and of itself, where (as you said) the monks 
have lived for hundreds of years without any evolution or improvement or 
betterness, then you can count me out. 

In BOTH contexts Paul describes, there is an unalienable 'betterness' at the 
heart of the experiential moment. In ZMM, the first context, there is an even 
greater emphasis played on how listening to, and responding to, that betterness 
makes us better mechanics, better welders, better riders, better teachers, 
better students, better fathers and better sculptors. We are 'artists' because 
the oscillation between experiential moment and the analogues we have evolves 
those analogues. The mechanic does not become artisinal simply by meditating or 
quieting his analogues, he becomes artisinal through the ongoing, lived, 
experiential oscillation between openness and (re)creation. 

In some ways I think you're trying to map the "two contexts" onto a "Western" 
and "Eastern" context. But what you fail to see is that Pirsig's ideas are not 
about casting off that "static West" for the "Dynamic East", but about a 
resolution that really brings the best of both together into harmony. The "tea 
ceremony" is replaced with the "repair shop", and in doing so Pirsig's ideas 
become about the everyday real experience and how both traditionally West and 
traditionally East perspectives, when integrated, can IMPROVE that everyday 
real experience. 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to