[djh] The Dynamic/East context is the same as context 1. The static/West context is the same as context 2.
[Arlo] I suggest you take some time and read Northrop's Meeting of East and West. There is really nothing more I can say to this, David. This "context" dichotomy has no value to me, and as a tool for you to compartmentalize/classify/stratify people I'd say it has a negative value overall. I'll leave it up to Paul to argue if you've misconstrued both his ideas and his point, but as far as I understand him, using "Dynamic/static, East/West" to label these 'contexts' is wrong, shortsighted and evidences serious misunderstanding. "Context 1" is simply Quality precedes subjects and objects. It is not "East" and it is not "Dynamic". "Context 2" is simply the evolutionary hierarchy that emerges in the wake of Quality, and it is neither "West" nor "static". Dynamic and static quality are present in both views, and traditionally eastern and western views are present in both views. I've already given one example to Dan about how a "context" should/could be illuminated by both of these lights. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
