>>> [Marsha] >>> You seem to have a great deal to say on what you think I should be >>> thinking. Now I am going to tell you what I think, I think you should work >>> on yourself before giving unsolicited advice. >> [djh] >> Sorry Marsha, I thought you were here to "explore RMP's Metaphysics of >> Quality and the MoQ's relationship to Buddhism, and the way they play in >> living my life." .. And considering you'd said that "Sometimes you might >> offer food for thought; that would be welcomed." I had mistakenly believed >> my thoughts on the topic you're interested in were solicited and welcome.
> [Marsha] > Not when you continually misrepresent what I say, make unfounded accusations > & assertions, make up evidence and tell me what I need to think. I don't > consider any of that 'exploring'. [djh] Contrary to your claims, I'm more than happy to be wrong about what I think you're saying - that's called exploring. That's why we can have a discussion. Just because I disagree with something you say, or misunderstand what you're saying doesn't mean that I'm telling you what you *need* to think. Part of any honest discussion involves agreement *and* disagreement. It's amazing to me that it's so hard to discuss with you what you actually want to discuss - 'I'm here to explore RMP's Metaphysics of Quality and the MoQ's relationship to Buddhism, and the way they play in living my life.' Really? I would love to discuss that with you. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
