more clear, asking Horse, Am i right?



2013/9/22 Eddo Rats <[email protected]>

> Hi All
>
>
> Andre:
> Agree. Marsha is NOT discussing Pirsig's MoQ. She is presenting her own
> interpretation based on her experience and 'empirical experience'
>
> Eddo asks:
>
> Are the good guys, on this forum, only discussing pirsig's interpretation
> of moq? And does, any other person who is considering to discuss a more
> personal interpretation of moq, have no right of speach?
>
> So it's here only about Pirsig's interpretation, and someone ,now and
> than, call's or writes RMP to check the facts?
>
>
> Am i right?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Eddo
>
>
> 2013/9/21 Andre Broersen <[email protected]>
>
>> Marsha to dmb:
>> Try to present an actual argument and present actual evidence to support
>> your claim. Where are the actual quotes made by me that put me in the
>> category of a nihilistic relativism or a solipsistic subjectivism?
>>
>> Andre:
>> By your insistence that all is emptiness (a la Nagarjuna). You use this
>> to dismiss any attempt to correct your confused understanding of Pirsig's
>> MoQ.
>> Secondly, you use your own experience to dismiss any attempt at
>> correcting your confused understanding of Pirsig's MoQ. You defended the
>> 'patterns are everchanging' in that it 'agrees with my experience and
>> synthesizes well with the MoQ, which is based on empirical experiences'.
>> I'll correct this statement by amending it to: 'agrees with my experience
>> and synthesises well with MY INTERPRETATION OF the MoQ, which is based on
>> MY INTERPRETATION of empirical experiences'.
>>
>> dmb said to Horse (who hopes Marsha will eventually learn):
>>
>> She simply refuses to discuss the MOQ itself. If it's not one excuse,
>> it's another. And it goes on like this day after day, month after month,
>> year after year. With a little trip through the archives and some cutting
>> and pasting, I could show you that this same pattern was occurring five
>> years ago. But please just take my word for it because that sounds really
>> boring for both of us.
>>
>> Andre:
>> Agree. Marsha is NOT discussing Pirsig's MoQ. She is presenting her own
>> interpretation based on her experience and 'empirical experience'
>> (difference??). The huge brick wall Marsha does not see from her own
>> perspective is that she is confusing her (vipassana) 'experience'
>> (purportedly bringing her in contact with DQ) with the INTERPRETATION of
>> that experience. And interpretations ARE sq. This may well point to her
>> confusion about the two. She sees them as the same as this may help her
>> perhaps as the only way out of her SOM/SOL intellect. As a way of moving
>> 'beyond' the MoQ (Marsha's confusion).
>>
>> Further, she uses Pirsig's quotes to not only back these claims up but
>> also the 'not this,not that' statement, among others. Problem is that this
>> statement, in the hands of Pirsig, makes perfect sense. However, in the
>> hands of Marsha this statement (as well as the Nagarjuna statement)is
>> lethal. It is confused, projecting,sarcastic,ironic, insulting,
>> misrepresentative and nihilates the MoQ (to use some of Marsha's own
>> jargon).
>>
>> Years and years and years have now gone by and Lucy sticks to her game.
>> I, me mine, I, me mine, I me  mine. Pirsig's MoQ transcends the personal,
>> ego driven, self-centered interpretations. And if Marsha is only half-way
>> through her investigation of the MoQ and Buddhism (self-admittingly no
>> expert on either of them), coupled with her (incomplete) vipassana persuit
>> she should wait with the presentation of her findings until she has
>> completed her project.
>> It is unscientific to make grand statements about something based on
>> incomplete findings, when the results are not all in yet. Hence her own
>> rebuttals in defense, her Lucy tricks and, of course her feigned sincerity.
>>
>> She is simply NOT OPEN to learning from others.
>>
>> Sorry, but that's my take on this.
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/**listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-**moqtalk.org<http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org>
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/**pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.**org/<http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/>
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.**html <http://moq.org/md/archives.html>
>>
>
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to