dmb,

On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:31 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> Marsha said to Andre:
> Yes, I get that, and I am not using [ unpatterned ] as "nothing there" or as 
> "all is quiet"; I am using it as stated in the rest of the quote. As Ant 
> suggested to David Morey (DQ/sq as WATER/ice - Apr 11, 2013) "it's sometimes 
> helpful to replace the term "Dynamic Quality" with the the term "Unpatterned 
> Quality".
> 
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> Let us suppose that it's right to think of Dynamic and static as unpatterned 
> and patterned or as water and ice. No problem. I might want to argue that 
> static patterns aren't as rigid as the H2O analogy suggests, but at least 
> it's consistent and it makes sense. 
> 
> Then ask yourself if it makes sense to describe the static, the patterned, or 
> the ice as "ever-changing"? Doesn't make much more sense to do exactly the 
> opposite and describe the dynamic, unpatterned water as "ever-changing"?
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, obviously, because "constant change" is basically the definition of 
> "dynamic". Thus, you are using the definition of "dynamic" in your definition 
> of "static patterns". That is a problem. It is not consistent with Pirsig's 
> terms or descriptions and it doesn't even make sense in terms of ordinary 
> language. This is the confusion that needs to be addressed. The description 
> of DQ and sq as unpatterned and patterned is fine so long as one understand 
> its meaning but it's perfectly clear that this is the distinction you've so 
> badly confused.
> 


Perhaps you are too static, too dogmatic.  


On Apr 29, 2013, at 3:20 PM, david buchanan claims:
"DQ, or reality itself is ever-changing. That's what "dynamic" means."


On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:31 PM, david buchanan wrote:
"... obviously, because "constant change" is basically the definition of 
"dynamic"."


Yet, RMP states:
"Change is probably the first concept emerging from this Dynamic experience..."
       (RMP, 'LILA's Child', Annotation 57)


Marsha:
But you are mistaken, change is a concept.  Dynamic Quality is not knowable, 
not definable, not divisible, not bounded, not patterned, not dualistic, "not 
this, not that"; there is nothing to change.



Marsha 
 
 
 
___
 
 
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to