Andre,
What did 'illusion' mean to YOU when you posted:
'The world is an illusion
Brahman alone is real
Brahman is the world'
In fact, I am not familiar with this MoQ ditty and I am unfamiliar with RMP's
use of 'Brahman'. Please explain how this relates to the MoQ?
Marsha
On Oct 22, 2013, at 3:53 PM, Andre wrote:
> Marsha stated to Andre:
>
> I stated that the "atomic bombs that dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki", and
> by proxy the 'static world',j are 'conventionally' or 'conditionally' real.
> That should have satisfied you.
>
> Andre:
> It obviously has not satisfied me one bit.
>
> The terms mean certain things to me (and not only me but dictionaries and
> philosophical and Buddhist interpretations as well) but I better ask: What
> do: 'conventionally' or' conditionally' mean to YOU upon which you base the
> observation that these events took place 'as/like an illusion'.
>
> And, for goodness sake...speak within the MoQ perspective please.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
