Hi DMB Is all data patterned? Interesting if yes, and obviously it is yes, ask a scientist, as James seems to think that patterned data underlies concepts, agreeing with me. What do you say? Who started the are you a 4 year old name calling exactly?
Looked up cloud cuckoo land yet, are you the chief bird? Made my night that blunder of yours! DM david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote: >DMB: asked David Morey: > >Why does the perceptual flux have to be patterned or white noise? > > > > >David Morey replied: > >James and me refer to data, you talk about perceptual flux for no relevant >reason, you must be able to read, so I can only conclude you are either a >clown or some kind of performance artist, ha ha ha, you are very funny! > > > >dmb says: > >Did you really just say, "me refer to data"? Are you really going to keep on >producing those run-on sentences? > >Contrary to your conclusion, I talked about the "perceptual flux" because >that's what I read in the James quote that you provided. Nothing could be more >relevant or obvious, you incredible hack. > >"The great difference between percepts and concepts is that percepts are >continuous and concepts are discrete. Not discrete in their being, for >conception as an act is part of the FLUX of feeling, but discrete from each >other in their several meanings. Each concept means just what it singly means, >and nothing else; and if the conceiver does not know whether he means this or >means that, it shows that his concept is imperfectly formed. The perceptual >flux [ PERCEPTUAL FLUX ! ] as such, on the contrary, means nothing, and is but >what it immediately is. No matter how small a tract of it be taken, it [ >PERCEPTUAL FLUX ! ] is always a much-at-once, and contains innumerable aspects >and characters which conception can pick out, isolate, and thereafter always >intend. It [ PERCEPTUAL FLUX ! ] shows duration, intensity, complexity or >simplicity, interestingness, excitingness, pleasantness or their opposites. >Data from all our senses enter into it [ PERCEPTUAL FLUX ! ], merged in a gene r > al extensiveness of which each occupies a big or little share ." > > >You're totally clueless about your evidence and yet you're calling me names? >Outrageous. > > > > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list >Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
