I would postulate, that the non-physical difference between man and woman is a 
difference in value, to meet their different needs. This subtle variation in 
value has trickled down, to larger personal and social differences.

This difference in value, logically, would be derived from the physical 
differences; The protection and safety required during pregnancy, being a stand 
out.

It seems tightly knitted, I wrote this in a hurry, to make the point that 
generally there must be a difference between men and women. So I ask, What are 
they? To what use can these or any gross generalisation of human interaction be 
put to?

Regards,
Richard

> On 2 Jan 2014, at 22:05, Joseph  Maurer <jh...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andre and All,
> 
> I do not doubt that there is a physical differentiation between men and
> women.  Both are sentient beings.  What about angels?.
> 
> What is the criteria for the differentiated aesthetic continuum?  Language?
> Does "undifferentiated aesthetic continuum" contain the experience of
> reality like sentient? Does reality impose further differentiations for
> verification like alive or dead?
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
>> On 1/2/14 12:50 PM, "Andre" <andrebroer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Not sure about this Joesince Northrop 'defines' reality as the
>> 'undifferentiated aesthetic continuum' I doubt if there is a
>> differentiation in experience/perspective.
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to