Hi Richard, I don't understand the meaning of "gross generalization" as applied to DQ/SQ terms? DQ/SQ requires precision in removing the clutter around SQ in metaphysical reality.
DQ is accepted as indefinable in the common logical perception of metaphysics dq/sq MOQ. Physics and Metaphysics! Metaphysics defines the logical approach to physical reality DQ/SQ. DQ, an experience of indefinable reality, SQ, Definable experience, e.g. individual. Can a principal of duality SOM justify DQ/SQ a principle of unity MOQ? Metaphysics seems to define individuality in DQ/SQ terms. The logic for a precise category, individuality, is necessary to communicate the perception of reality. Metaphysics, not physics. Physics follows a strict logic, mathematics, to describe reality. Physics has no logic for DQ/SQ metaphysical reality. The language of physics, mathematics, cannot accept logically the metaphysical reality DQ/SQ. DQ/SQ metaphysics are a pipedream in mathematics. How about reality? Joe On 1/3/14 4:11 AM, "Richard Skillen" <[email protected]> wrote: > To what use can these or any gross generalisation of human interaction be put > to? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
