dmb says:
As I understand it, the distinction between organic and inorganic is something
everyone already understands. It's not something Pirsig invented. It's just the
difference between Adam and the clay from which he was formed. It's the
difference between rocks and trees, between ants and suns. I don't understand
why anyone needs to ask such a question.
> Jan-Anders:
>
> By inspiration from Andre I'll suggest that we start a discussion about how
> to define the difference between level one, the inorganic and level two, the
> organic. I couldn't find any consistent thread in the Archives.
>
> Andre:
> 'Everything that has not been created by life (defined as DNA) is an
> inorganic value pattern'. Annot.42
>
> Ipso facto an organic pattern is the 'presence of DNA in a self-perpetuating
> pattern'. Annot.23
>
> The boundary between inorganic patterns and organic patterns is the virus
> 'because it is the simplest organism that contains DNA. I have read there is
> some dispute about the virus being living or dead, and I take this dispute as
> evidence that it is the boundary' Annotn. 48.
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
