DMB, Can't understand your reason for an MoQ101 statement of the bleedin' obvious? You even confirm that was your point. (I'm guessing this was an essay for some non-MD audience ?)
The biggest straw man conceivable, to even suggest any MD reader could think otherwise. Let's have something constructive. Ian On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:21 PM, John Carl <ridgecoy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dmb: > > All Very well said. To your last point: > > Implicitly, quietly, my point here is really to say that the MOQ cannot >> rightly be interpreted as anti-intellectual or as a vacuous relativism. >> Knowledge and skill are still essential features of the "arts" he's talking >> about. >> > > > I'd add, It seems obvious the MoQ is not anti-intellectual, not when the > MoQ is itself a highly intellectual and artful piece. The MoQ doesn't > oppose intellect. The MoQ puts intellect in its proper place.... > > artfully, > > John > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
