All,

I'm just going to sum up my response to y'all in a big lump sum.
Wouldn't want to go over my limit, heh.

But first, Dan.

Dan, I'll give you a copy if you'll give me Lila's child.  I somehow lost
my copy over the years and it looks like I'm going to need it.  Not with
you guys, of course - you all know it.  But I see my way clear now to a
masterly thesis.  I'ce got three paragraphs already circled in Randy's book
that I KNOW are MoQ orthodox, and while I can't sell anyone on the idea
that Royce co responds with Pirsig, (even tho they never once corresponded
at all) I'm thinking I bet I could interest the Royceans in the same fact.
So far I haven't been able to sell it, because it's just my word for what
the MoQ actually says.  And even I admit I'm no expert.

I'm sure y'all will back me up on that one.

Lila's child has the whole thing, in quotable format.  Nice.


But I don't see it as my mission to persuade anybody over here, that I'm
write - espectially dmb and Andre.  We've argued it out so much that sides
are hardened beyond rationality.  There's no reason to go on and on about
it.

John

PS:  Randy's been busy editing a paper on Dewey and Quality while he's here
so it's cut down on our sittin' time.  I'll try and get a peek at it - it
certainly has an intriguing title.






On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Andre <[email protected]> wrote:

> dmb says:
> Good point, Andre (and Ant). DQ is experience itself, which is also known
> as "the primary empirical reality," while faith is approximately the
> opposite of that.
>
> Andre:
> Thanks dmb. The grotesque problem with Ian's suggestion is that it
> seriously nullifies Pirsig's effort and shows a complete misunderstanding
> of Pirsig's achievement. The suggestion really reintroduces a religious
> faith again, in this case in 'quality'. One can only look on in horror and
> disbelief what a philosopher like Plato would do with this and since most
> subsequent philosophies are mere 'footnotes to Plato' we return to
> what?...faith and superstition, Absolutism, Objectivism, Realism,
> Subjectivism, modernity, post-modernity, post-post-modernity?
>
> dmb to Dan:
>
> Good point, Dan. I think art, science and religion are all under one
> umbrella, as you put it, because DQ is the source of each.
>
> Andre:
> Yes and this refers of course to what happened with the three during the
> Enlightenment Era... . For obvious reasons they were ripped apart but as
> Ken Wilber argues, the tragedy was that they were left dangling on their
> own. They were never reintegrated because one never identified the ground,
> the root, the foundation from which all three sprang...i.e. DQ or Quality.
> The result was and still is devastating:
> Ken Wilber:
> 'We have flatland. We looked at this as good news, bad news. The good news
> of modernity was that the Big Three were differentiated- art, science,
> morals (religion). The bad news was that they had not yet been integrated,
> and this allowed an explosive science [without any morals] to colonize and
> dominate the I and we domains'.
> (Ken Wilber, A Brief History of Everything' p 226).
>
> Of course Wilber has his own agenda and his own ways of saying and doing
> things but I am pretty sure he is no enemy of the MOQ.
>
> Pirsig of course reintegrates the lot of them and many others because:
> 'a Quality-centered map of the universe provides overwhelming clarity of
> explanation where all has been fog before. In the arts, which are primarily
> concerned with value, this was expected. A surprise, however, came in the
> fields that were supposed to have little to do with value. Mathematics,
> physics, biology, history, law- all of these had value foundations built
> into them that now came under scrutiny and all sorts of surprising things
> were revealed.
> Once a thief is caught a whole string of crimes is often solved'. (LILA, p
> 109)
>
> Without wanting to interfere/disturb too much it seems that Ian as well as
> John are trying to put on a burglary act without realizing (?) what they
> are potentially robbing us of.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
"finite players
play within boundaries.
Infinite players
play *with* boundaries."
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to