> On Aug 11, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ant McWatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's a subtle SOM habit (certainly for a Westerner) to think of rocks and > trees and all the other inorganic & biological patterns as somehow being MORE > real than social & intellectual patterns but Northrop shows us this is > scientifically & logically incorrect. This is why I think the MOQ > perspective - though unnatural at first for someone brought up in an SOM > dominated culture - is a more coherent and therefore BETTER one to hold.
Ron: That's another useful term, to "hold" a perspective. In land surveying When we try to give meaning to descriptions, we say we "Hold" certain physical and abstract Evidence for particular reasons. Our reasons are subjected to peer And legal Review. Where am I going with this? I guess I see a lot of similarities With orientation, when we hold Particular values for particular reasons we orient the way we Think and perceive, we lend a greater Broader meaning to the mosaic of Value in experience. In boundary survey the term "to hold" is an act Based on careful reflection, the act Of reference or source of belief. . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
