> On Aug 11, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ant McWatt wrote:

"It's a subtle SOM habit (certainly for a Westerner) to think of rocks and 
trees and all the other inorganic & biological patterns as somehow being MORE 
real than social & intellectual patterns but Northrop shows us this is 
scientifically & logically incorrect.  This is why I think the MOQ perspective 
- though unnatural at first for someone brought up in an SOM dominated culture 
- is a more coherent and therefore BETTER one to hold."

http://moq.robertpirsig.org/
 

Ron Kulp commented on the above, August 12th 2014:

"That's another useful term, to "hold" a perspective. In land surveying When we 
try to give meaning to descriptions, we say we "Hold" certain physical and 
abstract Evidence for particular reasons. Our reasons are subjected to peer
And legal Review. Where am I going with this?"

"I guess I see a lot of similarities With orientation, when we hold Particular 
values for particular reasons we orient the way we Think and perceive, we lend 
a greater Broader meaning to the mosaic of Value in experience. In boundary 
survey the term  "to hold" is an act Based on careful reflection, the act Of 
reference or source of belief."

Ant McWatt comments:

Ron, I didn't know that land surveyors used that phrase "to hold" as well. 
Interesting coincidence...  Anyway, I think a helpful way of looking at this 
issue is to use the map analogies introduced by Ron DiSanto in the first 
chapter of the "Guidebook to ZMM":

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/26/books/books-of-the-times-retracing-the-tire-prints-on-a-philosophical-journey.html


SOM is a particular map of the Human World, the MOQ is another one as is Roman 
Catholicism, Atheism and the many other "isms" that people have invented over 
the eons.  The MOQ is relatively a new map so (thanks to the genius of its 
creator, Robert Pirsig) takes into account many aspects of the contemporary 
world (from using technology to East Asian philosophy to the nature of 
celebrity) that older maps DON'T take proper account of or, worse still, miss 
all together.  

Does this make sense?

Ant


.




                                          
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to